A meta-catalog of AI legislation, regulation, and policy trackers — comparing scope, cadence, format, and coverage so you can find the one that fits your question instead of opening twelve tabs.
Suggest a tracker, flag an error, or just say hi.
What the trackers collectively miss — or at least don't cover well.
Cities like NYC, San Jose, and Baltimore have passed local AI rules. The NLC City AI Governance Dashboard is a start, but coverage remains thin. Most trackers still stop at the state line.
Plenty of trackers list what passed. Akin and Holistic AI track enforcement and litigation, but systematic coverage of penalties assessed and compliance rates remains thin. Still largely a "so what" gap.
Government AI procurement standards and requirements are scattered across agency-specific guidance. No single tracker aggregates them comprehensively.
Manatt's healthcare AI tracker is the standout, but financial services, defense/intel, and employment AI rules remain fragmented. No tracker besides Manatt does a single sector end-to-end across jurisdictions.
White House AI commitments, industry pledges, standards body frameworks — the OECD tracks some, and AlgorithmWatch cataloged 160+ ethical guidelines before going dormant in 2024. The full universe of non-binding AI governance remains poorly mapped.
Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia are actively legislating AI. The OECD, CAIDP Index (75+ countries), and Oxford Insights (195 countries) have expanded coverage, but deep analysis of non-Western jurisdictions remains thin.
AI-related lawsuits are shaping policy as fast as legislation. Akin and Holistic AI both include litigation, but systematic case law tracking with outcomes remains sparse. A whole parallel universe, still mostly untracked.
Agency guidance, interpretive letters, and FAQ updates move fast and often matter more than statutes. A few trackers cover this, but most focus on enacted law.
| ☐ | Name ▼ | Organization | Category | Scope | Format | Cadence | Status | Link |
|---|